sarahkeenihan

Posts Tagged ‘challenge’

Day 342. Playing on the see-saw

In July 2013 on July 19, 2013 at 10:58 am

seesaw

I like to play on the see-saw.

I sit on one end, and encourage others to join me. We mess about, adding and subtracting children and toys, varying the ends at which we sit, and our positions along the axis.

It wobbles up and down, occasionally hitting the ground hard, sometimes sending us sky high but usually hovering at or around the horizontal position.

My life feels like that.

Having learnt that I operate best mentally and intellectually when I’m busy, I have loaded up my life see-saw. Three  children, part-time work, various unpaid work-like activities (which I love), exercise, other hobbies, a social life and shoe shopping.

It’s a precarious balance that works most of the time. We wobble around parallel to the ground and are happy.

Sometimes a big fat monster climbs onto one end of our see saw. The creature is an illness, an extra work deadline or an emotional challenge for a parent or child.

BANG.

We hit the ground. We try not to panic. We rearrange the various weights at each end of the see-saw. Sometimes, the balance tips the other way.

But eventually, we’re back on even ground again.

I’m scared what might happen when a really big challenge rocks my world. But I’ll deal with that when it comes, I guess.

[image thanks to kIdonnelly on flickr]

Advertisements

Day 289. Disagreement

In May 2013 on May 29, 2013 at 1:12 pm

disagreement

Disagreement is not something I’m particularly good at.

Already ‘une femme du certain age‘, it’s a skill I’m developing slowly.

Two articles I read recently reminded me how important it is to be able to stop, consider, challenge information and stand up for accuracy.

Associate professor of medicine and pharmacology Jalees Rehman wrote an article for the UK’s Guardian newspaper on the need for critical writing in science journalism. Referring to the bulk of popular science writing as ‘infotainment’, Jalees states,

“infotainment science journalism rarely challenges the validity of the scientific research study or criticises its conclusions.”

Ideally, he’d like to see writers challenge the assumptions that scientists make, and take the time to offer independent and detailed critical analysis. His implication is that if you’re reporting on science it’s simply not good enough to take the words of scientists – and their public relations managers – and repeat them verbatim. Instead,

“Critical science journalism takes a different approach and focuses on providing a balanced assessment of the work, one that highlights specific strengths but also emphasises specific limitations or flaws.”

Writers must be prepared to do the hard yards and perform their own investigations as to the validity and strength of the scientific findings in studies they report on. Major flaws and misrepresentations need to be pointed out.

Over at Women’s Agenda, Angela Priestly also highlights the need to challenge flaws and assumptions, this time in the arena of business leadership. Interviewing businesswoman Janine Gardner, Angela asked her to elaborate on what she believed courageous leadership to entail. She summarised it thus:

“We want leaders who’re willing to stand in their own spotlight, who always trust their values and will publicly declare when they think something is wrong. Such leadership requires more than simply saying, ‘I don’t agree’ and instead confronting a challenge or the status quo and seeking to change it.”

This, I want to improve on. Identifying poor information and doing something about it.

[image thanks to Between a Rock on flickr]